Nov 2, 2018 路 Fujinon XF16-80mmF4 Vs Fujinon Zooms. After my recent Fujinon XF33mmF1.0 vs XF35mmF1.4 vs XF35mmF2 comparison, readers asked me if I can compare the size of the Fujinon XF 16-80mmF4 with the XF18-55mmF2.8-4 and XF16-55mmF2.8. You ask, I deliver ;). And based on this comparison, the XF16-80mmF4 looks like a fantastic travel lens! Jan 15, 2021 路 And other than focal range (and starting at 16mm), XF 16-80mm is weather resistant, has better optical image stabilization and marked aperture ring, so there`s more to it. On the other hand, XF 18-55mm is definitely more compact (and it`s noticeable) I still don鈥檛 get the love for the 16-80mm. Nov 19, 2023 路 16-55 vs 16-80: at an impasse Nov 19, 2019 12 Back when I shot Sony, the allure of Fujifilm's dials and retro-styling was dogged. I had to convert. I told myself I Key Features. Well-suited for a wide variety of shooting situations, the FUJIFILM XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR is a versatile 24-120mm-equivalent zoom, spanning wide-angle to medium-telephoto, and featuring a constant f/4 maximum aperture. Complementing this flexible design is an advanced optical layout, which includes a trio of aspherical elements
Jul 25, 2022 路 Or you could pair this with the 16-55 (because the 16-80 is a horrible lens) and create an awesome two zoom combo with enough sharpness to cover the gap between 55 and 70mm. As I am finishing up my 100-400 & 150-600 reviews right now, I can confidently say that the 70-300 is my favorite XF telephoto lens.
\n \n 16 55 vs 16 80
16-55 is the APS-C equiv to the 24-75/2.8 which we call the "variable prime" in Nikon FF speak. Studio quality production lens for pros. Great wide open but killer at around f5.6-f8. The 16-80 is the equivalent to the 24-120/4 "Street Sweeper".
Use our simple tire height calculator to calculate the tire height of metric tire sizes. Just input your metric measurement and click on "convert height" to view the tire height in inches. Then browse the suggested tire sizes that are close to the entered tire height. Just click on the tire sizes to view a list of tires manufactured in that
May 20, 2015 路 For $100 net for 16-55 vs $300 for the XF 18-55 with the X-T10 kit. Its a good value if you want to get started and is "above average" compared to other kit lens from Nikon and Canon IMHO. In contrast, the 18-55 is probably the best kit lens you can buy from any camera manufacturer. Fuji, Nikon, Canon, Panasonic, Samsung, Olympus. Because the Sigma isn't weather sealed. And the Fuji is a bit less bright than the other two. But it has an aperture ring. And the Sigma's zoom ring turns the other way compared to the others. The Tamron is probably sharpest in the corners. I like my Fuji. It's a good all-purpose lens, not too big, renders a nice smooth bokeh, and with great .
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/108
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/187
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/622
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/589
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/88
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/622
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/972
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/846
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/148
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/651
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/836
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/977
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/344
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/542
  • 0lsgbmxxia.pages.dev/663

    • 16 55 vs 16 80